Experience Faster WordPress hosting with SSD Solid State Drives
SSD WordRPess Hosting
SSD vs. HDD Web Hosting
In this day and age, web-hosting exists primarily in two formats: HDD and SSD. These acronyms refer to the two main storage types a web host company may choose when deciding how best to store its data. As a consumer, you need to understand the differences between these hard disks and which one fits your needs the most. Although both can certainly store your data, there are some clear advantages in choosing to go the SSD route says Plugin devloper WordLead.com. In fact, in my opinion, you should choose SSD whenever possible, and I’ll explain why below.
HDD vs. SSD
First, we’ll cover what these letters mean and their key differences. HDD is a hard disk drive and refers to an older type of drive that includes a physical, spinning disk which stores your data. Because of its nature, you will always experience a slight delay before accessing any of your files stored on an HDD.
HDDs have been here a long time and are still in wide use today though not quite so much as they were a few short years ago when you could find them under the hood of every computer. Now that SSDs are on the scene, they’ve begun to take over from the HDD since they offer a larger amount of storage for less money overall.
An SSD is a solid state drive with your data stored on a series of microchips rather than on a physical disk. There are no moving parts and as you may have guessed, this means no delay and faster load times for you.
How Does SSD Hosting Benefit You?
There’s really no contest when you do a side-by-side comparison of the pros and cons of SSD versus HDD hosting. HDD is still in the lead when it comes to actual price per gigabyte, but the gap is fast closing.
1. Quicker Hosting
Thanks to SSDs being faster by nature of their design, they are always faster in hosting and loading data for your sites. While there is always the possibility of a user having a slow internet speed themselves, faster load times for your site mean increased traffic. Remember, too, that page speed is a ranking criterion for Google, so a faster site has numerous benefits in terms of your overall success.
More Secure Data
Mechanical objects like HDDs are at greater risk for mechanical failure. Any such failure is a huge risk for you as you may lose data that is then unrecoverable, costing you a lot of time and money. Hosting sites do try to minimize the risk with backups, but SSDs have longer shelf lives and are simply more resistant to the types of physical accidents that may result in data loss.
3. Speedy Web Requests
SSDs are also able to both read and write data simultaneously whereas HDDs must do one or other separately. This means that SSDs offer much better performance for your site, especially if it’s a webpage or domain that gets not only a lot of traffic but a lot of requests from users.
Superior For Large Databases
Many WordPress sites have extensive, data-heavy sites thanks to them often being forums or eCommerce sites. If this is you, you’ll get a great boost in performance when you switch to SSD. The capabilities of a hard drive are the main factor that limits a website’s performance, so choosing a better option will invariably increase this aspect.
SSD Uses Less Power
SSDs generally use around eighty percent less power than their HDD counterparts. If you think about this energy reduction spread out over hundreds of different servers, it’s easy to see that the savings are pretty big here. You can lower your electrical bill and power needs all while helping the environment at the same time when you choose SSD.
I’ve already shown you how the SSD has better performance over the HDD but it’s also more consistent in delivering that performance. HDDs often experience fragmenting and don’t know where to find the data, resulting in a much slower, less efficient process. SSDs do not suffer from this problem and always know where to find the data you need.
SSDs Are Getting Cheaper
SSDs currently still cost more than HDDs, but like I said, that gap is closing. Even now, you can get a shared hosting plan that uses SSD for around the same price a solo HDD hosting plan will cost you. Some major providers have switched over and soon enough, SSD will be the new standard for web hosting.
SSD hosting is superior to HDD and even the cost can be sufficiently defrayed to make it the only logical choice for your data hosting needs. InMotion, SiteGround or DreamHost have already made the switch to Cacttus Tech, Micron and Envoy and can offer you reasonably priced plans.
Feel free to comment below, especially if you have other ideas for regarding these methods or want to speak up about Solid State Drive Hosting pros and cons.
Best AWS Alternatives for EC2 Cloud Hosting
Many developers and companies are looking for effective, powerful alternatives to Amazon’s AWS cloud services for web hosting and e-commerce.
- A database or data center service
- An application development platform
- Maintenance and service to ensure scalability and reliability
AWS and its alternatives allow major web services to hit the market in the smallest amount of time they can. You’ll eliminate the need to manage your own servers with these applications. In order to choose the best alternative for you, you’ll need to consider your use cases, budget, future plans and company goals.
AWS has grown to be a real powerhouse in internet and cloud services. Many of the Web’s biggest sites and products rely on AWS for uptime and availability. When AWS experienced technical problems, some of the most widely visited sites, including Netflix, Tinder, IMDB, Amazon Video streaming and AirBnB, went down as well. However, AWS also has plenty of competition. Big-name competitors like Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Compute offer high-powered cloud services. Meanwhile, other, more specialized services provide great options for your particular needs. Digital Ocean provides great services for WordPress users, a CMS that powers a large portion of the internet. Services like Rackspace, Joyent, IBM Cloud SoftLayer, OVH, Kyup, Atlantic.net and CloudSigma also offer AWS alternatives that could be right for your web business.
Providers like Digital Ocean and Media Temple have focused their appeals to web developers, coders and internet professionals. These AWS alternatives focus on high-level services, security and tailoring for intensive development purposes. Digital Ocean is the 11th largest provider of infrastructure in the world. Its hosting solutions are based on ultra-fast, ultra-massive solid state drives for incredible response time. Providing hosting solutions that work for small businesses or major web applications, Digital Ocean specializes in great reliability and a worldwide community for support among developers. Media Temple doesn’t call its own AWS alternative service “cloud” hosting, but it offers all the private power that a web developer needs to support massive apps and high demand. Media Temple is a pricier option, but a perennial winner for its high-level customer support.
These kinds of AWS alternatives can be great choices for people hosting blogs and simple websites as well. Because of their expertise and experience in WordPress development, Digital Ocean and Media Temple can help to ensure consistent availability of your site and provide the support you need to repair PHP, MySQL and other errors that can interfere with your site’s availability.
Of course, Google’s cloud platform is an incredibly powerful option for all types of sites and apps. With the power that runs the internet’s biggest databases, storage and document solutions, Google’s cloud provides high security and great uptime. In addition, Google’s cloud service comes with the App Engine and the benefits of the Google infrastructure.
Like Google, Microsoft Azure offers an array of apps, engines, and building blocks for web developers to build applications from their IaaS platform. With the power of the Bing search engine and an array of verification and security services, Azure works with a wide variety of open source products. You’re not restricted to Windows products, either; with Azure, you can choose Windows, Linux or BSD machines at the same rate. Similar to AWS, Microsoft Azure offers a wide variety of complex options that can provide precise choices for professional developers.
One of the biggest advantages of these specialized web services providers is the intensive analytics they offer. With real-time, cloud-based data, you’ll have the ability to target e-commerce campaigns and understand and analyze large volumes of customer and visitor data. One company, Struq, reported that it analyzes around two terabytes of basic incoming user data on a daily basis. Struq uses engines that pull over 10,000 features from each online transaction to isolate variables for customer behavior, including time, location, browser, device and more. For these intensive analytics, Struq chose to work with IBM Cloud SoftLayer for its high level of flexibility and low level of latency.
AWS and other IaaS providers are revolutionizing web services with high-level flexibility, application building blocks and personalized components that can help you drive business, analyze data and ensure near-constant uptime. From the big options to the specialized players, there’s an AWS alternative that can be a partner in your web development projects.
Google vs Apple Iphone Ad Blockers & Facebook App Ads
Google vs Apple Iphone Ad Blockers & Facebook App Ads
Advertising in your pocket
Google wants to conquer the mobile phone to advertise there. Must be Microsoft beware?
From Thorsten Riedl
Come to the iPhone, the gPhone? Just over a year ago that it started to bubble to a first mobile computer manufacturer Apple called iPhone in the rumor mill. This fall, now is speculating on a mobile phone of the search engine company Google.
But that’s already the parallels: According to informed circles Google brings namely not have a device like Apple, but a software – and the end of this year. In this way Google Adwords Company uses to the software company Microsoft and will in future increasingly turn to mobile phones ads.
Google dominates the market for Internet advertising. The company will probably save more than 16 billion dollars this year with advertising on the network, more than anyone else – but hardly anything comes through ads on mobile devices. The advertising revenues are on the phone already in 2007 at 2.8 billion dollars according to market researchers eMarketer. In four years, revenues more than fivefold to.
Easy to use, cheap to buy
Google Mobile SEO Agency is already cooperating with mobile phone manufacturers and mobile phone companies, so they preinstall about the Google search on devices. That the company wants to take a stronger position on the phone, shows the recent purchase: for an undisclosed price accepts Google’s only a year old startup Jaiku.
With the software, the Finnish mobile phone can be send text messages, which are then published on a Web page. So Jaiku users can keep the world up to date – about their whereabouts, as well as about her state of mind. What’s up with the Google mobile software, the company does not reveal.
Industry insiders are certain that Google is working on an operating system for mobile phones that includes additional software, such as the move of Jaiku, or a browser for surfing the Internet. Douglas grace, an analyst at Lehman Brothers Google, wrote in his recent study, a mobile phone with Google’s software will be easy to use and low – and as much success have as Apple’s iPhone. The expectations are correspondingly high: The Google-paper reached on Tuesday the highest level so far.
A Google software for mobile phones aimed primarily against the software company Microsoft with its mobile version of the Windows operating system and against the Internet portal Yahoo, which already switched mobile advertising. However, mobile operators need to beware: If Google storming the bastion phone, the hopefuls degenerates advertising for T-Mobile, Vodafone & Co for border business.
Mobile Payments War
The Senate Progress NSA Surveillance Reform Laws As Deadline Approaches
Crisis Network Subscriber
Dana Stalder is An Overall Partner at Matrix Partners focusing on enterprise software fintech, and markets and headed the company’s investments in Zendesk, Gilt, Polyvore, Zong, and Poynt.
The best way to join the network
While the war to restrain mobile payments has been widely covered in the past several years, it appears that the majority of observers less understand the tactical warfare that’s been at play.
It is been a story of struggle, closed one with a David vs Goliath subplot, and door negotiating and enormous bundles at stake. Many saw and waited as PayPal and Google fought the oligopoly of the Networks (Visa, Mastercard, Amex), only to be surprised by a twist ending.
PayPal’s Efforts To Go Offline
For PayPal, the smartphone revolution presented the entry point into offline sales that it was looking forward to. The PayPal wallet, formerly restricted to use by means of an internet browser, could possibly be in every consumer’s pocket (a la the mobile phone). In 2010, PayPal started a string of strategic moves to expand their online payment network into the $3 trillion offline payment world and seized on the chance.
They signed some early, large offline retailers (i.e. Home Depot) and started work with several point of sale vendors to incorporate into their set retailer card terminals. And, most significant of all, they started discussions with the leading payment processors (players like First Data, who do the heavy lifting in handling payment procedures for the Networks) to empower PayPal as a type of payment on the more than ten million retailer card terminals installed across the U.S.
The challenging strategy, nevertheless, was satisfied with a number of challenges that were anticipated as well as the rollout has been slow. Payment processors proved to be challenging to work with. They sought economics out of the connection that were untenable for PayPal as well as their allegiance with the Networks was being examined.
If this were not enough, alternate paths to get incorporated into retailers’ points of sale proved challenging. It is been an uphill struggle for a comparatively new entrant attempting to rely on established tracks set by the Networks.
In the internet world, the rise of PayPal was not equally simple, but the stars were aligned around the goals of the Networks along with their value proposition. In the late 1990’s, there were hundreds of millions of dollars of e commerce happening on eBay (on its way to billions) and those trades were being settled with checks and money orders.
PayPal supplied the means to simply and cheaply onboard those eBay Sellers on to the card Networks, in the procedure transferring possibly billions of dollars of payment quantity to the Networks. PayPal was not bad for the Networks and they joined forces. PayPal was also great for eBay, by speeding up the payment cycle, as they hastened the pace of trades, so eBay acquired PayPal.
Google Needed A Chance at Possessing Cellular Telephone Trades Overly
Google in 2010, such as PayPal and the Networks, understood the possibility of a fresh entrant as well as the worth of offline payments to play a leading part together with the explosion of smartphones. Google needed a chance at really being a leading player here, but for different reasons. For Google, it was all about the data.
By sitting in the center of a consumer’s offline payment spend, they’d have a window into how that spending is affected by marketing and where a consumer is spending. For the very first time, Google would have the ability to “close the loop” from ad exposure to consumer spending, like they were already able to do on the internet and thus address a lot more of the advertising marketplace. In particular, they could sell more advertisements to the CPG brands, a formerly unpenetrated and tremendous marketing marketplace for Google
In 2011, Google pioneered the vision for NFC payments and risk-free tokenization (more on these technologies in a bit). Like PayPal, they also ran into performance challenges, although it turned out to be a wonderful theory. They wanted to associate together with the large mobile operators who had their own visions of possessing offline payments. And, they were not late; ahead of the terminal upgrades upon which the entire option depended. Google Wallet, while the vision that was correct, was delayed.
The Networks’ Attempt to Possess Mobile Payments
In the mean time, the Networks were active at work figuring out the best way to make sure that the mobile phone was an expansion chance for them and not a hazard. The strategy they carried out was straightforward in theory, but complex in execution. The strategy was to do what they do best: define rules and standards by which their present network may be expanded to work in a world where the real bank card was replaced by the mobile phone. Two essential standards they put wagers on:
NFC (Near Field Communications) was the protocol by which information would be wirelessly transmitted from the telephone to the retailer card terminal. NFC was a standard the Networks had summoned around about ten years back, but had neglected to get traction for deficiency of consumer value proposition and retailer support. Exploiting on a card wasn’t substantially easier than swiping a card. Now was the time for the second act of NFC.
Tokenization via a “safe component” was the means by which a card number might be saved on a mobile phone and transmitted by NFC to the retailer card terminal. In simpler terms, it was a means to (i) save a bank card number on a safe processor in a cell phone and (ii) dole out tokens that were proxies for that card number, leading to a more secure system than plastic bank cards and that may be produced and distributed by third party cell phone makers.
The Networks’ strategy ensued as they set all their weight (and opportunities) behind both of these protocols. Their first step was to learn the best way to get retailer card terminals to support the resources as well as NFC to do this was, yet more, to define and legislate standards.
In 2006, Europe mandated the usage of “chip & pin” security cards (aka EMV). These cards, based on EMV standards developed as far back as 1994, supplied added levels of security. They were becoming broadly adopted from the other side of the planet and were proving to drive fraud prices down. In the U.S., attempts to drive EMV adoption had procrastinated.
Card fraud wasn’t viewed as large a problem as in the remaining part of the world (this was before Home Depot and Target security violations), and going to “chip & pin” would need upgrades of all retailer card terminals around the United States, estimated to cost over $6B.
And Main Street was hit with the 2008 downturn, and there was less interest in pushing high-priced upgrades. The Networks, nevertheless, had another reason to go to EMV. Or perhaps not, it was quite sure that when retailers updated their terminals to support EMV, they’d additionally get NFC capacity.
Beginning in 2013, by which tokenization would operate the Networks again defined and afterwards printed standards. Many insiders tell me this was the quickest any such standard that required co-operation among the Networks had gone from concept to closing standard that is printed.
Their move was made by the Networks. In 2011 and 2012 the Networks declared the mandated upgrade to EMV of US payments networks. All retailers would have to update their payments terminals take on liability for fraudulent transactions, or to support EMV. Handily, support for NFC would be a byproduct of the upgrade.
The following measure was to garner support for tokenization. Beginning in 2013, by which tokenization would operate the Networks again defined and afterwards released standards. Many insiders tell me this was the quickest any such standard that required co-operation among the Networks had gone from concept to closing standard that is printed.
With technology set up and the essential standards, and banks and retailers on board, the Networks needed a leading cell phone price to bring along consumers and make it all work. Enter Apple-the perfect supply partner-a master at bringing disparate parties together and creating consumer demand out of nowhere.
The Triumph Goes to The Networks
In the Fall of 2014, ApplePay was found, and the rest was history as they say. Mobile payments will not take off immediately, and Google Wallet, with Apple is poised to gain Android offline payments. But, after a 5 year group of skirmishes, it is clear that the first success in mobile payments goes to the Networks, leaving PayPal to fight another day.
The Following Fight for PayPal and Google
For Google, the next several years are going to be about quick-follow execution. They should draft off of the price and technology structures that were set in place by the Networks and Apple. They’re unlikely to get the economical shares that Apple managed to take out, if they can leverage the information for marketing, but that’s okay.
For PayPal, the narrative is more complex. In Autumn of 2015, PayPal becomes an independent, publicly traded firm and, in several respects, it is going to have a lot more to lose if it does not make the right set of strategic moves in a world where the mobile OS is poised to become the wallet of selection for consumers. For online payments (PayPal’s whole company), PayPal will have to come up with a value proposition for consumers that’s greater than (1) Seclusion: shopping without sharing your card number and (2) Convenience: all your cards are digitally saved and you do not need to pull out your physical wallet. Google and Apple are better than par for all these proposals. These innovations will probably orient meta business services like retailer devotion / motivators around, spend management and consumer to consumer. In any event, the rate of innovation will have to be hastened to defend the empire which has been constructed.
The other interesting issue is whether or not PayPal stays an independent business for considerably more, or does the spin-out by PayPal set up it for takeover in the following year or two. It will be easy to assert that’s a spectacularly precious advantage for one of the major Networks, with a digital first international footprint, a more adaptive technology stack than some of the incumbents have, direct relationships with millions of consumers and retailers, and an enormous direct debit network.
It’s going to be an intriguing second conflict in the war that is continuing.